{"id":10503,"date":"2012-08-07T02:46:30","date_gmt":"2012-08-06T17:46:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10503"},"modified":"2012-08-07T02:46:30","modified_gmt":"2012-08-06T17:46:30","slug":"debito-org-newsletter-august-5-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10503","title":{"rendered":"DEBITO.ORG NEWSLETTER AUGUST 5, 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Books etc. by ARUDOU Debito (click on icon):<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/inappropriatecoverthumb150x226.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-8577\" title=\"inappropriatecoverthumb150x226\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/inappropriatecoverthumb150x226.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/handbook.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1298\" title=\"HANDBOOKsemifinalcover.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/02\/HANDBOOKsemifinalcover.jpg\" alt=\"Handbook for Newcomers, Migrants, and Immigrants to Japan\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/tshirts.html\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1701\" title=\"joshirtblack2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/05\/joshirtblack2-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\\&quot; width=\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/japaneseonly.html#japanese\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1700\" title=\"jobookcover\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/05\/jobookcover-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\u300c\u30b8\u30e3\u30d1\u30cb\u30fc\u30ba\u30fb\u30aa\u30f3\u30ea\u30fc\u3000\u5c0f\u6a3d\u5165\u6d74\u62d2\u5426\u554f\u984c\u3068\u4eba\u7a2e\u5dee\u5225\u300d\uff08\u660e\u77f3\u66f8\u5e97\uff09\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/japaneseonly.html#english\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1699\" title=\"japaneseonlyecover\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/05\/japaneseonlyecover-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"JAPANESE ONLY:  The Otaru Hot Springs Case and Racial Discrimination in Japan\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cinemabstruso.de\/strawberries\/main.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2735\" title=\"sourstrawberriesavatar\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/03\/sourstrawberriesavatar.jpg\" alt=\"sourstrawberriesavatar\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?cat=32\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4921\" title=\"debitopodcastthumb\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/debitopodcastthumb.jpg\" alt=\"debitopodcastthumb\" width=\"100\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10137\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-10142\" title=\"Fodors\" src=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/04\/Fodors.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nUPDATES ON TWITTER: arudoudebito<br \/>\nDEBITO.ORG PODCASTS on iTunes, subscribe free<\/p>\n<p><strong>DEBITO.ORG NEWSLETTER AUGUST 5, 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Table of Contents:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>SOME PROGRESS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1) Hurrah, the separate Alien Registration System is abolished after 60 years. Now let\u2019s consider the GOJ give &amp; take regarding tracking NJ under this policy<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 2) Japan Times on reaffirmed J workers\u2019 \u201cright to strike\u201d, thanks to judicial precedent set by defeated 2012 nuisance lawsuit from eikaiwa Berlitz Inc.<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 3) Yomiuri: Iwate town sponsors Vietnamese future doctor \u2014 and people reportedly react with trepidation<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 4) Tangent: Louis Vuitton Journeys Award shortlisted J movie short has multicultural couple<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>NO PROGRESS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>5) Suraj Case: Chiba prosecutors decide not to indict 10 Immigration officers in whose custody he died<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 6) H-Japan on \u201cApartheid or Academic Accuracy: Japan\u2019s Birth Rate\u201d, Tohoku U Prof Yoshida\u2019s demographic research methodologically excludes \u201cforeigner births\u201d<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 7) Japan Times: \u201cNinjin-san ga Akai Wake\u201d Book is behind bullying of mixed-race children; contrast with \u201cLittle Yellow Jap\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>MEDIA SKULLDUGGERY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8 ) Tangent: Parliamentary Independent Investigation Commission Report on Fukushima Disaster \u201cMade in Japan\u201d: MD notes ironies of different Japanese and English versions<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 9) Tangent: Newsweek column on \u201crising ugly nationalism towards foreign residents\u201d in China. Hm, how about an eye on Japan?<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 10) Resurrecting Gregory Clark\u2019s embarrassingly xenophobic Japan Times column on \u201cGlobal Standards\u201d Nov 1, 1999, quietly deleted without retraction from JT Online archives<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>\u2026 and finally&#8230;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>11) Japan Times JUST BE CAUSE Column 53 July 3, 2012: \u201cIn formulating immigration policy, no seat at the table for NJ\u201d<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong><em> \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>By ARUDOU, Debito (debito@debito.org, www.debito.org, twitter arudoudebito)<br \/>\nFreely Forwardable<\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>SOME PROGRESS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1) Hurrah, the separate Alien Registration System is abolished after 60 years. Now let\u2019s consider the GOJ give &amp; take regarding tracking NJ under this policy<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>After many years of bureaucratic policy trial balloons and lots of advance warning, July 9, 2012 has finally come to pass, and the longstanding Alien Registration System, promulgated in 1952 to help the GOJ keep track of the pesky aliens (mostly former citizens of the Japanese Empire who were stripped of their Japanese citizenship) who wouldn\u2019t go back to \u201ctheir country\u201d (staying on in Japan as Zainichi, generational \u201cforeigners\u201d born in Japan to this day), has been abolished sixty years later. In its place, NJ are now registered on Japan\u2019s juuminhyou Residency Certificates \u2014 closing up a ludicrous system where only citizens could be registered as \u201cresidents\u201d (juumin) despite paying Residents\u2019 Tax (yup, juuminzei), and teeth-grindlingly stupid moves such as local governments giving animals and fictional characters their own honorary \u201cjuuminhyou\u201d despite untaxable status. Now NJ can also now be listed with their Japanese (and non-Japanese) families properly as family members and heads of household (no longer excluded even from local population tallies for not being listed in the juumin kihon daicho). Finally, closure to that. Good riddance.<\/p>\n<p>That said, the new system also includes new Gaijin Cards (Zairyuu Kaado), which are higher-tech versions (I say remotely trackable due to the RFID technology inside, by design; see below) and still required under criminal law to be carried 24-7 under penalty of search, seizure, and possible incarceration for a week or three. That hasn\u2019t changed. In fact I would now argue it\u2019s gotten worse \u2014 since Japanese citizens (even if computer chip technology has also been introduced into J driver licenses and passports, which not all Japanese get anyway) are not required by law to carry any ID whatsoever at all times. Some historical links regarding the true intention of the ZRK (tracking and control of untrustworthy NJ, not convenience for them as is generally sold) follow.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ll paste some articles below and let\u2019s see what the media has made of this. Feel free to tell us how the changes have been affecting you as well.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10414\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10414<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>2) Japan Times on reaffirmed J workers\u2019 \u201cright to strike\u201d, thanks to judicial precedent set by defeated 2012 nuisance lawsuit from eikaiwa Berlitz Inc.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In one important NJ legacy, Japan\u2019s courts have, according to the Japan Times, reaffirmed the right to strike for \u201claborers\u201d (roudousha) in Japan\u2019s private sector. Note that the right to strike has been denied to public-sector laborers \u2014 a legacy of SCAP\u2019s \u201cReverse Course\u201d of 1947-8 (Akira Suzuki, \u201cThe History of Labor in Japan in the Twentieth Century\u201d, in Jan Lucassen, ed. \u201cGlobal Labour History\u201d, pg. 181), when the American occupiers were worried about Japan \u201cgoing Red\u201d like China and North Korea; to maintain administrative order, bureaucrats were explicitly denied the right to strike or engage in political activities (fortunately, they retained the right to vote; thanks for small favors). But in the face of eroding labor rights over the past few decades (when, for example, the rights of permanently-contracted workers to not have instant termination without reason, were being abused by unilateral contract terminations of NJ educators), a nuisance lawsuit by Berlitz against its eikaiwa workers fortunately ended up in the reaffirmation of their right to strike last February. Since we have talked about it on Debito.org at great length in the past, I just wanted to note this for the record. And say thanks, good job, for standing your ground for all of us.<\/p>\n<p>Japan Times: Over 100 Berlitz Japan teachers struck over 3,000 lessons between December 2007 and November 2008 in order to win a 4.6-percent pay hike and one-off one-month bonus. The language school claimed the strikes were illegal mainly because the union gave little notice of the impending strikes\u2026 Tokyo District Court dismissed the entire case in its Feb. 27, 2012, verdict, reaffirming the powerful guarantee of the right to strike in Japan.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10477\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10477<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>3) Yomiuri: Iwate town sponsors Vietnamese future doctor \u2014 and people reportedly react with trepidation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In light of how NJ nurses under a national visa program have been treated in the face of a chronic careworkers shortage, here we have a case where even local sponsorship of a NJ doctor is also viewed (according to the Yomiuri, which may indeed in the interest of \u201cbalance\u201d be conjuring up a tempest in a teapot) with suspicion because she is a foreigner. After all, she might not stay! Then again, so might not anyone else being trained on that scholarship program regardless of nationality. Ah, but foreigners are different, you see. They always represent a flight risk\u2026 Anyhoo, good news tainted with an editorial bias of caution and trepidation just because the subject is NJ.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Yomiuri: Facing a serious and chronic shortage of doctors, the town of Ichinohe felt it necessary to look overseas to find medical staff willing to live and work in the rural area. The town plans to spend more than 10 million yen on school and living expenses for a Vietnamese woman on the condition that she will practice medicine in the town for at least seven years after obtaining her license.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The unusual plan raised eyebrows when the town ran it by the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry, and some residents have questioned why the town is sponsoring a foreigner. However, Ichinohe Mayor Akira Inaba believes the unprecedented plan is just what the town needs. \u201cThe scholarship program for Japanese medical students hasn\u2019t attracted enough applicants to meet its quota,\u201d he said. \u201cWe have no other choice but to secure our doctors on our own.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10354\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10354<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>4) Tangent: Louis Vuitton Journeys Award shortlisted J movie short has multicultural couple<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Debito.org Reader: <em>In late May 2012, I was approached by a young and passionate Tokyo guy. He asked me if I can act in a short silent movie. He said that he is shooting this movie to participate in Louis Vuitton\u2019s Journeys Awards competition. The competition gives emerging artists\/producers\/directors an opportunity to get into limelight.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>When he explained me the script, I could see why he approached me specifically. The story was about an Indian professional who was married to a Japanese woman. The Indian had to return to India \u2026 and the movie was about the moments of emotions after he told this to his wife. He was asking me to share the real moments of my life for his movie!<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Please check the following link to watch the (5 minute) movie online.<\/em><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.journeysawards.com\/en_US\/shortlisted\/Departure\/\">http:\/\/www.journeysawards.com\/en_US\/shortlisted\/Departure\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>While this movie is not directly related to your core topics of discussion in debito.org, I think the selection of this movie in shortlisted 10 (from among 100s of submissions), proves two things in a very subtle way\u2026 two very important things.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>What does the movie\u2019s shortlisting success prove?<\/em><br \/>\n<strong>1) Young Japanese artists\/producers\/directors are open to multicultural Japan and they are willing to take a chance on Japan that is not homogeneous.<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> 2) Multicultural Japan can compete just as effectively as monocultural Japan (there is another movie from Japan also in shortlisted 10!)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10404\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10404<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>NO PROGRESS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>5) Suraj Case: Chiba prosecutors decide not to indict 10 Immigration officers in whose custody he died<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Sad news. The Suraj Case, which has been covered in various media reproduced here on Debito.org, has wound up as predicted: With the Immigration officers getting off with no indictment and the GOJ getting away with murder (if not negligence leading to homicide while in official custody). Even the Japan Times called his death \u201cbrutal\u201d. It\u2019s bad enough when you have a criminal justice system where even citizens are victims of \u201chostage justice\u201d. It\u2019s another when you can get away with killing somebody during deportation just because they\u2019re foreign. One more brick in the wall to demonstrate that once the Japanese police get your hands on you as a NJ, you don\u2019t stand a Chinaman\u2019s Chance, be it in Japan\u2019s criminal investigations, incarceration systems, jurisprudence and standards of evidence, criminal court, or civil court afterwards. In a word, disgusting.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Mainichi: The Chiba District Public Prosecutors Office decided on July 3 not to indict 10 officers of the Tokyo Regional Immigration Bureau on charges of assault and cruelty resulting in a Ghanaian man\u2019s death when they overpowered him aboard an aircraft. In deciding to drop the case, the Chiba District Public Prosecutors Office said, \u201cThere is no causal relationship between the action (by the immigration officers) and the death (of the Ghanaian man), and the action was legitimate.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10407\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10407<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>6) H-Japan on \u201cApartheid or Academic Accuracy: Japan\u2019s Birth Rate\u201d, Tohoku U Prof Yoshida\u2019s demographic research methodologically excludes \u201cforeigner births\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>One social statistic that is very politically-charged in Japan (along with the unemployment rate, which is according to some kept low due to methodological differences in measurement) is Japan\u2019s birth rate. I have already argued that Japan\u2019s demographic science is already riddled with politics (in order to make the option of immigration a taboo topic). But here is another academic arguing that how the birth rate is measured differs from time to time, sometimes resulting in not counting NJ women giving birth in Japan! In other words, Japan\u2019s demographic science is methodologically leaning towards only counting births of Japanese citizens, not of births of people in Japan \u2014 and a prominent scientist named Yoshida at Tohoku University is actually advocating that NJ births be excluded from Japan\u2019s birth rate tally, for the purposes of formulating \u201cappropriate public policy\u201d! Application of the Nationality Clause to demographics to systematically exclude them from public policy considerations? The author of this piece from H-Japan calls it \u201capartheid\u201d. So would I.<\/p>\n<p>John Morris: <em>The starting point for Professor Yoshida\u2019s research is the discrepancy between the official birth rate announced by the Japanese government. The birth rate for years when a census conducted is higher than that for years when there is no census. The reason for this is that in census years, the birth rate is calculated on the basis of women of Japanese nationality resident in Japan, whereas in non-census years the birth rate is calculated using the total number of women in the relevant age cohort; i.e. including women of foreign nationality resident in Japan. Professor Yoshida recalculated the birth rate for 2011, a non-census year, excluding women of foreign nationality from his figures and compared it to the birth rate for 2010, a census year, for various levels of local governmental bodies across Japan. His press release demonstrates that when comparing 2011 and 2010, the official figures for the birth rate show either no change (10 prefectures ) or a decline across the prefectures of Japan, whereas when the 2 years are compared using his equivalent data, the birth rate shows a decline in only 8 prefectures (of which 5 are most likely affected by the events of March 2011), and actually shows an increase (albeit small) in 30 prefectures\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Professor Yoshida\u2019s work contains two problems. If he wishes to point out the methodological inconsistency in the way the current Japanese birth rate is calculated, he has an important and very valid point. All scholars who use the official figures for the Japanese birth rate should be aware of his research. However, if he is going to claim (as he does in his press release and on public television and radio) that his figure are the objectively \u2018correct\u2019 figures for the Japanese birth rate, than his calculations are just as methodogically flawed as the governmental figures that he criticises. His calculations assume that all children of Japanese nationality born in Japan are born by women of Japanese nationality. The rate of marriages of Japanese men to women of foreign nationality has accounted for 3.2 to 4.6% of all marriages in Japan over the past 10 years or so. The overwhelming majority of children born from these marriages will be registered as \u2018Japanese nationals.\u2019 The gist of Professor Yoshida\u2019s criticism of the official figures for the birth rate in non-census years is that they are lower than the reality. However, the figures that he claims are the objectively correct figures, by the same token, will always produce a figure for the birth rate that is higher than the reality, because it denies that there are children born to mothers of foreign nationality throughout Japan. If Professor Yoshida merely wished to demonstrate the inconsistency of the official figures for the Japanese birth rate then his research would be valid. However, to claim that his figures are objectively correct is not as invalid as the data that he criticises and for exactly the same reason that he criticises the government figures, the gross insult that he has committed by denying the existence of 10\u2019s of thousands of women of foreign nationality married to Japanese men and bearing Japanese children is unforgivable&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10441\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10441<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>7) Japan Times: \u201cNinjin-san ga Akai Wake\u201d Book is behind bullying of mixed-race children; contrast with \u201cLittle Yellow Jap\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How the media portrays minorities and people of differences in any society is very important, because not only does it set the tone for treatment, it normalizes it to the point where attitudes become predominant, hegemonic, and unquestioned. This article in the Japan Times regarding a book that portrays blackness as \u201cdirty\u201d is instructive, in that it shows how people react defensively when predominant attitudes are challenged. The dominant, unaffected majority use the inalienable concepts of culture and identity (particularly in Japan) as blinkers, earplugs, and a shield \u2014 to deny any possibility of empathy with the people who may be adversely affected by this issue.<\/p>\n<p>And I consider this to be a mild example. Remember what happened when Little Black Sambo was republished by Zuiunsha back in 2005, after years of being an \u201cun-book\u201d in Japan? But Sambo was just seen as a \u201ccute\u201d character, with no provided historical context of the world\u2019s treatment of the Gollywog (after all, Japan often does not consider itself \u201cof the world\u201d when it comes to racial discrimination; some even profiteer off it). It was actually being used as a teaching tool in Saitama to impressionable pre-schoolers in 2010; nothing like forming Japanese kids\u2019 attitudes early! So I did a parody of it (\u201cLittle Yellow Jap\u201d) to put the shoe on the other foot. THEN the accusations of racism came out \u2014 but in the vernacular against me for parodying it! (Here\u2019s an example of someone who \u201cgot it\u201d, fortunately.) The same dynamic is essentially happening below.<\/p>\n<p>Joel Assogba: <strong><em>But, when I once ran across and brought home a picture book, \u201cNinjin-san ga Akai Wake\u201d (\u201cThe Reason the Carrot is Red\u201d) from the local library, my children got quite upset.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Written by renowned Japanese author of children\u2019s literature Miyoko Matsutani, the story unfolds like this: A carrot and a burdock ask a white radish (daikon) out to a bath. The burdock jumps in the water but soon hops out because the water is too hot; it remains black. The carrot stays in the hot water longer and turns red. The daikon cools the bath with some cold water and washes himself thoroughly, which turns him shining white. At the end, the three stand beside each other to compare their color. The burdock is black and dirty because he did not wash his body properly; the daikon is white and beautiful because he did.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>When I was talking about this story during one of my lectures on human rights issues at a PTA meeting in Fukuoka, one of the participants, a Japanese mother of an African-Japanese preschool boy, started crying and saying that her son was taunted, ridiculed and called \u201cburdock\u201d after his pre-school teacher read the aforementioned book to the class. When the little boy returned home that day, he jumped into the bathtub, started washing his body and crying, \u201cI hate my light brown skin, I hate the burdock, I\u2019m dirty and I want to be like the white radish!\u201d How can this child have a positive image of himself?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10342\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10342<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>MEDIA SKULLDUGGERY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>8 ) Tangent: Parliamentary Independent Investigation Commission Report on Fukushima Disaster \u201cMade in Japan\u201d: MD notes ironies of different Japanese and English versions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re going to do a tangent now away from our regular focus of life and human rights in Japan, and talk about life and, er, human rights in Japan (except in general, not as they specifically impact on NJ). Debito.org has talked at length about the whole Fukushima Fiasco in the past (even asked fruitlessly for naysayer capitulation when our initial assertions of public corruption and coverup proved to be pretty much spot-on), but only in concentrated bursts, as it is something well discussed elsewhere. Nevertheless, Debito.org Reader MD sent me a poignant post involving \u201ccultural ironies\u201d regarding differences in the English and Japanese versions of the official report on Fukushima that I thought deserved a wider audience, so here it is blogged.<\/p>\n<p>My comment: This linguistic prestidigitation is par for the course due to, as I have written before, the institutionalized culture of lying in Japan. Tatemae and honne \u2014 the two great ways to justify speaking differently out of two corners of one\u2019s mouth \u2014 made clearer as never before, by having one official report on the world\u2019s arguably worst (but definitely ongoing) nuclear disaster use the Japanese language as a code for domestic consumption, and its English translation to handle the gaijin. And true to character, as was noted by the chairman, it\u2019s the gaijins\u2019 fault for not understanding our Japanese\u2026!<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10428\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10428<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>9) Tangent: Newsweek column on \u201crising ugly nationalism towards foreign residents\u201d in China. Hm, how about an eye on Japan?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a tangent, here\u2019s an article looking at issues of race and ethnicity in China through a veil of vignettes. A lot of the issues raised can be (and have been) applied to Japan. Just not as harshly. I\u2019ve made the point before about how the Western media seems to give Japan a free pass regarding racism as a \u201cfriendly\u201d state. Yet, as per the Newsweek article below, Western media couches racism more as representative of the spectre of Chinese nationalism and bad treatment of expats. Compare: When we had the ultimate example of racism in Japan during the Otaru Onsens Case (1999-2005), the overseas press took it up handily, but we also had oodles of apologists rise up en masse to dismiss or defend it. Including Western toadies like Gregory Clark (see how clumsily Clark took up this USA Today article of March 8, 2000 by Peter Hadfield on racism in Japan back in the day), who defended it as Japanese cultural uniqueness and exceptionalism to \u201cglobal standards\u201d (said pundit even went so far as to claim \u201cantiforeigner discrimination is a right for Japanese people\u201d \u2014 while in the process getting even the exclusionary onsen\u2019s name wrong). But I digress.<\/p>\n<p>Again, I\u2019m not sure why Japan is so seductive to the Western media (Dower would perhaps claim it\u2019s part of the GOJ\u2019s media savviness, starting with the Imperial duck hunt charm offensive of SCAP that saved the Imperial system (Embracing Defeat, p. 299-301)), while China keeps getting treated as devious. The only theory I can come up is geopolitics (and the fear that the future of democracy and economic growth will have Chinese uniparty characteristics). What say you, Readers?<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Newsweek: In recent months, tensions over the unsavory behavior of some of Beijing\u2019s foreign residents have come to the fore. In May there was a furious public reaction after footage was posted online showing the aftermath of an alleged attempted sexual assault on a young Beijing woman by a drunken British man. The pictures showed angry locals beating up the supposed perpetrator. This was soon followed by film of an incident on a train in which a Russian cellist from the Beijing Symphony Orchestra insulted a Chinese passenger who asked him to take his feet off the back of her chair. The cellist eventually made a public apology, but still had to resign his post.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Amid a mood of public anger, at least in online forums, the Beijing police announced a three-month campaign to crack down on \u201cforeigners illegally staying in the capital\u201d\u2014including those who had jobs but no work permit or who had overstayed their visas. They also set up a hotline and encouraged locals to \u201creport such violations,\u201d according to Chinese media. Several other cities, including Shanghai, also stepped up spot-checks on the documents of foreigners, in the most visible campaign of its type since the run-up to the Beijing Olympics in 2008.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10481\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10481<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong>10) Resurrecting Gregory Clark\u2019s embarrassingly xenophobic Japan Times column on \u201cGlobal Standards\u201d Nov 1, 1999, quietly deleted without retraction from JT Online archives<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When doing research on how Japan Times columnist Gregory Clark led the Apologist counterattack on criticism of Japan for institutionalized racism (as witnessed at the time by the Ana Bortz Case of 1998-9 and the Otaru Onsens Case of 1999-2005), I discovered that one of his most xenophobic columns, entitled \u201cProblematic Global Standards\u201d of November 1, 1999 (weeks after the Bortz verdict in Shizuoka District Court made clear that racism, none other, existed within these shores) has long been deleted from the Japan Times archive. I think after reading it you might understand why a publisher would be embarrassed for ever publishing it, but deletion is simply not on. I happen to have a hard copy of it in my archives, and upon rereading, it\u2019s easy understand why a publisher would be embarrassed for ever publishing it. But deletion without retraction from a newspaper archive is simply not on. So let\u2019s type it out in full now, so it becomes word-searchable by the search engines for posterity. Bigots, media fabricators, and profiteers like Clark deserve to be hoisted by their own petard.<\/p>\n<p>Clark (1999): <strong><em>No doubt the judge involved saw the U.N. connection as the ultimate in global standards. Many in the media here were equally enthusiastic. Few seem to have considered the corollary, namely that from now on not just the jewelers but anyone in the merchandise business will have to embrace another \u201cglobal standard\u201d \u2014 the one that says they should regard all customers as potential criminals to be welcomed with guns, guards, overhead cameras, and squinty-eyed vigilance.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>True, discrimination against foreigners can be unpleasant, and in Japan it includes refusals to rent property. But as often as not, that is because they do not want to obey Japan\u2019s rules and customs. Refusal to respect the culture of a host nation is the worst form of antiforeign discrimination.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10483\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10483<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8230; and finally\u2026<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>11) Japan Times JUST BE CAUSE Column 53 July 3, 2012: \u201cIn formulating immigration policy, no seat at the table for NJ\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>My Japan Times JUST BE CAUSE Column 53 dated July 3, 2012, is on the Japanese Government\u2019s renewed policy debate on creating conditions conducive to immigration (without actually portraying it in any way as \u201cimmigration\u201d (imin), just more NJ residents). It\u2019s their attempt to address Japan\u2019s demographic and probable economic nosedive despite their assiduous efforts over the decades to a) exploit NJ as temporary workers on a revolving-door labor visa regime, b) blame NJ for all manner of social ills, including foreign crime and desertion, and in the process c) poison the public debate arena for productive discussion about ever treating NJ well enough that they might want to actually stay (since the past three years have seen the NJ population continuously dropping, after 48 years of unbroken rise). The writing\u2019s on the wall, and the GOJ is finally doing something constructive. But (as usual) the bureaucracy is controlling the agenda, and the typical blind spots are coming into play, so as things stand now I think the policy drive will be ineffective. Have a read and a think.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10396\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=10396<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/<\/p>\n<p>All for this month! Enjoy the gokiburi column next Tuesday!<\/p>\n<p><strong>ARUDOU, Debito (debito@debito.org, www.debito.org, twitter arudoudebito)<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> DEBITO.ORG NEWSLETTER AUGUST 5, 2012 ENDS<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Table of Contents:<br \/>\nSOME PROGRESS<br \/>\n1) Hurrah, the separate Alien Registration System is abolished after 60 years. Now let\u2019s consider the GOJ give &#038; take regarding tracking NJ under this policy<br \/>\n2) Japan Times on reaffirmed J workers\u2019 \u201cright to strike\u201d, thanks to judicial precedent set by defeated 2012 nuisance lawsuit from eikaiwa Berlitz Inc.<br \/>\n3) Yomiuri: Iwate town sponsors Vietnamese future doctor \u2014 and people reportedly react with trepidation<br \/>\n4) Tangent: Louis Vuitton Journeys Award shortlisted J movie short has multicultural couple<br \/>\nNO PROGRESS<br \/>\n5) Suraj Case: Chiba prosecutors decide not to indict 10 Immigration officers in whose custody he died<br \/>\n6) H-Japan on \u201cApartheid or Academic Accuracy: Japan\u2019s Birth Rate\u201d, Tohoku U Prof Yoshida\u2019s demographic research methodologically excludes \u201cforeigner births\u201d<br \/>\n7) Japan Times: \u201cNinjin-san ga Akai Wake\u201d Book is behind bullying of mixed-race children; contrast with \u201cLittle Yellow Jap\u201d<br \/>\nMEDIA SKULLDUGGERY<br \/>\n8 ) Tangent: Parliamentary Independent Investigation Commission Report on Fukushima Disaster \u201cMade in Japan\u201d: MD notes ironies of different Japanese and English versions<br \/>\n9) Tangent: Newsweek column on \u201crising ugly nationalism towards foreign residents\u201d in China. Hm, how about an eye on Japan?<br \/>\n10) Resurrecting Gregory Clark\u2019s embarrassingly xenophobic Japan Times column on \u201cGlobal Standards\u201d Nov 1, 1999, quietly deleted without retraction from JT Online archives<br \/>\n\u2026 and finally&#8230;<br \/>\n11) Japan Times JUST BE CAUSE Column 53 July 3, 2012: \u201cIn formulating immigration policy, no seat at the table for NJ\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-newsletters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10503\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}