{"id":141,"date":"2007-01-01T23:29:28","date_gmt":"2007-01-01T14:29:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=141"},"modified":"2007-01-03T22:07:36","modified_gmt":"2007-01-03T13:07:36","slug":"asian-pacific-u-gloats-over-its-court-injunction-victory-over-dismissed-workers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=141","title":{"rendered":"Asia Pacific U gloats over its court injunction victory over dismissed workers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hello Blog.  Nice how the school is so up-front about how total the victory over its employees is.  Sounds like a real pleasant place to work.  Yet another case of labor rights being chipped away&#8230; Debito in Sapporo<\/p>\n<p>From the Asia Pacific University website:<br \/>\n==================================<br \/>\n<b>Notices : Dismissal verdict for the demand for a preliminary<br \/>\ninjunction on the preservation of status launched by former full-time<br \/>\nJapanese language lecturers.:<\/b><br \/>\n2006\/12\/25 9:48:00 (325 reads)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.apu.ac.jp\/home\/modules\/news\/article.php?storyid=431\">http:\/\/www.apu.ac.jp\/home\/modules\/news\/article.php?storyid=431<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In relation to the demand for a preliminary injunction in order to<br \/>\npreserve the positions outlined in the employment contracts of former<br \/>\nfull-time Japanese language lecturers originally hired in April of<br \/>\n2002 and who had fulfilled their 4 year period of employment, the<br \/>\nOita District Court (presiding judge: KAMINO Taiichi) handed down its<br \/>\nverdict on November 30th, unequivocally dismissing the suit launched<br \/>\nby the former lecturers.<\/p>\n<p>The Court in its ruling confirmed that Ritsumeikan, in its efforts to<br \/>\nimprove language education at APU, was both reasonable and had cause<br \/>\nin abolishing the positions within the lecturer system in order to<br \/>\nplan for the creation of a new lecturer organization. As to whether<br \/>\nthe decision to halt the employment of the lecturers was fair and<br \/>\njust, the Court ruled that:<\/p>\n<p><b>1. There was no truth to the allegation that Ritsumeikan, at a<br \/>\nJapanese language workshop held in 1999, had indicated that it would<br \/>\nendeavor to allow full-time Japanese language lecturers to extend<br \/>\ntheir period of employment should they wish to do so.<\/p>\n<p>2. That it was possible to infer that expectations for a continuation<br \/>\nof employment stemmed from the 1999 Japanese language workshop, yet<br \/>\nthere was no reason for such expectations.<\/p>\n<p>3. That the employment contracts in question (for full-time<br \/>\nlecturers) outlined an employment period of 4 years (the period of<br \/>\nguaranteed employment), that the contracts provided a period of<br \/>\nemployment of 1 year, and that although this touched upon Article 14<br \/>\nof the former labor standards law, it was appropriate in this case.<\/p>\n<p>4. That in accordance with the completion of the period of<br \/>\nemployment, the decision to halt the employment of the former<br \/>\nlecturers did not constitute abuse of the right to dismissal.<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Court acknowledged that the response of Ritsumeikan was fair, and<br \/>\nthus summarily rejected the former lecturers&#8217; demand.<\/p>\n<p>December 2006<br \/>\nRitsumeikan Asia Pacific University Vice President<br \/>\nENDS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Asia Pacific University, a subsidiary of Ritsumeikan, in Oita, Kyushu, has announced on its home page its victory in the courts, regarding an injunction on the preservation of status launched by former full-time Japanese language lecturers.  Nice bit of gloating.  Sounds like a lovely place to work.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,19,16,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-education","category-labor-issues","category-lawsuits"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/141\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}