{"id":14298,"date":"2016-11-24T14:39:00","date_gmt":"2016-11-25T00:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=14298"},"modified":"2016-11-24T14:39:00","modified_gmt":"2016-11-25T00:39:00","slug":"moj-bureau-of-human-rights-survey-of-nj-residents-and-discrimination-je-full-text","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=14298","title":{"rendered":"MOJ Bureau of Human Rights Survey of NJ Residents and discrimination (J&E full text)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Books, eBooks, and more from Dr. ARUDOU, Debito (click on icon):
\n\"Guidebookcover.jpg\"<\/a>\"japaneseonlyebookcovertext\"<\/a>\"Handbook<\/a>\"\"<\/a>\"\u300c\u30b8\u30e3\u30d1\u30cb\u30fc\u30ba\u30fb\u30aa\u30f3\u30ea\u30fc\u3000\u5c0f\u6a3d\u5165\u6d74\u62d2\u5426\u554f\u984c\u3068\u4eba\u7a2e\u5dee\u5225\u300d\uff08\u660e\u77f3\u66f8\u5e97\uff09\"<\/a>\"sourstrawberriesavatar\"<\/a>\"debitopodcastthumb\"<\/a>\"FodorsJapan2014cover\"<\/a>
\nUPDATES ON TWITTER: arudoudebito
\nDEBITO.ORG PODCASTS on iTunes, subscribe free
\n“LIKE” US on Facebook at http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/debitoorg<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.facebook.com\/embeddedrcsmJapan<\/a>
\nhttp:\/\/www.facebook.com\/handbookimmigrants<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JapaneseOnlyTheBook<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.facebook.com\/BookInAppropriate<\/a>
\nIf you like what you read and discuss on Debito.org, please consider helping us stop hackers and defray maintenance costs with a little donation via my webhoster:
\n\"Donate<\/a>
\nAll donations go towards website costs only. Thanks for your support!<\/i><\/p>\n

=================================<\/p>\n

From: XY<\/strong>
\n Subject: MOJ NJ Survey<\/strong>
\n Date: November 14, 2016<\/strong>
\n To: debito@debito.org<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dear Debito,<\/strong><\/p>\n

I am XY, a long year NJ resident. First I want to thank you for the great work you do to enhance human rights in Japan. I learned most of the discrepancies between law and practice<\/a> (especially Hotels<\/a> *cough*) from your blog. Great work.<\/em><\/p>\n

Now to the actual reason of my mail. I have recently read on debito.org about that human rights survey the ministry of justice is conducting right now<\/a>, and today I got the survey documents in Japanese and English. In your blog you ask for scans of these documents to check the nature of this survey. Here they are (downloadable PDFs):<\/em><\/p>\n

\u5916\u56fd\u4eba\u4eba\u6a29\u30a2\u30f3\u30b1\u30fc\u30c8\uff08Cover Letter\uff09<\/a>
\n\u5916\u56fd\u4eba\u4eba\u6a29\u30a2\u30f3\u30b1\u30fc\u30c8\uff08\u82f1\u8a9e\uff09<\/a>
\n\u5916\u56fd\u4eba\u4eba\u6a29\u30a2\u30f3\u30b1\u30fc\u30c8\uff08\u65e5\u672c\u8a9e\uff09<\/a><\/p>\n

=================================<\/p>\n

COMMENT FROM DEBITO:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Debito.org has focused on the GOJ’s biased surveys regarding human rights and NJ in the past, and found the science to be very bad<\/a>. This poor science has even been found in\u00a0surveys of NJ residents at the national\u00a0(here<\/a>, here<\/a>,\u00a0and\u00a0here<\/a>) and local levels (Tokyo<\/a> and Urayasu<\/a>, for example). It’s amazing how quickly common human decency and equal treatment evaporates from Japan’s social science just as soon as “foreigners<\/a>” are brought into the equation.<\/p>\n

So that’s why I approached these new surveys for “Foreigners Living in Japan” (as opposed to “Non-Citizen Residents of Japan”) from the Ministry of Justice Human of Human Rights (BOHR), Center for Human Rights Education and Training<\/strong>, with some trepidation. \u00a0Especially given the BOHR’s longstanding\u00a0record of unhelpfulness<\/a> and abdication of responsibility<\/a> (see also book “Embedded Racism<\/a>“, pp. 224-231). \u00a0But let’s take a look at it and assess. \u00a0Here is a sampling of\u00a0pages from the English version in jpg format (the full text in Japanese and English is at the above pdf links).<\/p>\n

First, two pages from the statement of purpose from the Cover Letter, so you get the tone:<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-001\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Document-page-002\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Next, here’s the odd very first question. \u00a0It inquires whether the foreigner being surveyed actually interacts with Japanese, or lives as a hikikomori<\/em> hermit inside a terrarium. \u00a0(It’s a bit hard to envision this kind of question coming from other governments. \u00a0In a question about discrimination towards NJ, why is this the first question? \u00a0Is it a means to discount future responses with, “Well, it’s the foreigner’s own fault he’s discriminated against — he should get out more”?). \u00a0Anyway:<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-006\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Skipping down to the next section, we see that they get to the discrimination issues (housing first, and that’s a major one<\/a>) pretty systematically, and with the possibility of open-ended answers. \u00a0Good.<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-008\"<\/p>\n

Same with\u00a0discrimination in employment:<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-009\"<\/a><\/p>\n

And then discrimination in access to services and in daily interactions:<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-010\"<\/a><\/p>\n

And then we get to a decent list of miscellany. \u00a0Note that there is no mention of any discrimination by officialdom, such as\u00a0police harassment, racial profiling, or Gaijin Card Instant Checkpoints on the street or in hotels<\/a>.\u00a0 (Naturally: \u00a0The BOHR is part of the Ministry of Justice, as are the\u00a0Japanese police forces — and their bunker mentalities are but an inevitable part of\u00a0managing Japan’s security and erstwhile “world’s safest society” against outside\u00a0threats<\/a>). \u00a0According to this list, discrimination\u00a0only seems to happen because of nasty “Japanese people” as individuals, not because of\u00a0something more systemic and embedded, such as Japan’s laws, enforcement of laws, or judiciary<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-011\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Then we get to issues of hate speech<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-012\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Document-page-013\"<\/p>\n

Then we get to the subject of what to do about it. \u00a0The survey starts\u00a0off with the typical boilerplate about “cultural differences” (the regular way of blaming foreigners for “being different”, thereby deserving differential treatment), but then by item 6 we get a mention of a law against preventing “discrimination against foreigners” (as opposed to racial discrimination, which is what it is<\/a>). \u00a0So at least a legislative\u00a0solution is mentioned as an option. \u00a0Good.<\/p>\n

\"Document-page-014\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The rest talks about what measures the surveyed person has\u00a0taken against discrimination using existing GOJ structures (the BOHR). \u00a0Then it concludes some background about the surveyed person’s age, nationality, visa status, home language, etc. (which is where that funny first question about “how much contact do you\u00a0have with Japanese?” should have come; putting it\u00a0first is, again, indicative.)<\/p>\n

CONCLUSION<\/strong>: \u00a0In terms of a survey, this is an earnest attempt to get an official handle on the shape and scope of discriminatory activities in Japan, and even mentions the establishment of anti-discrimination laws as an option. \u00a0Good. \u00a0It also includes the first real national-level question\u00a0about discrimination in housing in Japan, which hitherto\u00a0has never been surveyed beyond the local level. \u00a0I will be very interested to see the results.<\/p>\n

That said, the survey\u00a0still has the shortcoming of the GOJ not accepting any culpability for discrimination as created and promoted by officials, including Japan’s police forces, laws, law enforcement, or legislative or judicial processes. \u00a0It still seems to want to portray discrimination as something that\u00a0misinformed or malicious individuals do toward “foreigners”, without getting to the root of the problem: \u00a0That the real issue is racial discrimination embedded within Japan’s very identity as a nation-state (as I uncover and outline in book “Embedded Racism”<\/a>). \u00a0Here’s hoping that research helps inform their next survey (as my research informed the Cabinet’s previously biased survey questions back in 2012 (page down)<\/a>). \u00a0Dr. ARUDOU, Debito<\/p>\n

========================<\/p>\n

Do you like what you read on Debito.org? \u00a0Want to help keep the archive active and support Debito.org’s activities? \u00a0We are celebrating Debito.org’s 20th Anniversary in 2016, so please consider donating a little something. \u00a0More details here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Submitter XY: I have recently read on debito.org about that human rights survey the ministry of justice is conducting right now, and today I got the survey documents in Japanese and English. In your blog you ask for scans of these documents to check the nature of this survey. Here they are (downloadable PDFs):<\/p>\n

Debito: Debito.org has focused on the GOJ’s biased surveys regarding human rights and NJ in the past, and found the science to be very bad. This poor science has even been found in surveys of NJ residents at the national (here, here, and here) and local levels (Tokyo and Urayasu, for example). It’s amazing how quickly common human decency and equal treatment evaporates from Japan’s social science just as soon as “foreigners” are brought into the equation.<\/p>\n

So that’s why I approached these new surveys for “Foreigners Living in Japan” (as opposed to “Non-Citizen Residents of Japan”) from the Ministry of Justice Human of Human Rights (BOHR), Center for Human Rights Education and Training, with some trepidation. Especially given the BOHR’s longstanding record of unhelpfulness and abdication of responsibility (see also book “Embedded Racism”, pp. 224-231). But let’s take a look at it and assess. Here is a sampling of pages from the English version in jpg format (the full text in Japanese and English is at the above pdf links).<\/p>\n

Conclusion: In terms of a survey, this is an earnest attempt to get an official handle on the shape and scope of discriminatory activities in Japan, and even mentions the establishment of anti-discrimination laws as an option. Good. It also includes the first real national-level question about discrimination in housing in Japan, which hitherto has never been surveyed beyond the local level. I will be very interested to see the results.<\/p>\n

That said, the survey still has the shortcoming of the GOJ not accepting any culpability for discrimination as created and promoted by officials, including Japan’s police forces, laws, law enforcement, or legislative or judicial processes. It still seems to want to portray discrimination as something that misinformed or malicious individuals do toward “foreigners”, without getting to the root of the problem: That the real issue is racial discrimination embedded within Japan’s very identity as a nation-state (as I uncover and outline in book “Embedded Racism”). Here’s hoping that research helps inform their next survey (as my research informed the Cabinet’s previously biased survey questions back in 2012).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[67,28,36,22,34,35,5,4,16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-embedded-racism","category-anti-discrimination-templates","category-bad-social-science","category-cultural-issue","category-exclusionism","category-good-news","category-human-rights","category-japanese-government","category-labor-issues","category-8"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}