{"id":149,"date":"2007-01-03T15:12:17","date_gmt":"2007-01-03T06:12:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=149"},"modified":"2008-04-23T12:25:04","modified_gmt":"2008-04-23T03:25:04","slug":"asia-pacific-university-blacklisted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=149","title":{"rendered":"Asia Pacific University Blacklisted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hi Blog.  Have just updated the Blacklist of Japanese Universities, a website which warns the public about limited employment opportunities in Japanese academia.  Joining the 99 universities up there is the following entry:<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/blacklist.html#apu\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/blacklist.html#apu<\/a><\/p>\n<p>===========================<br \/>\n<b>NAME OF UNIVERSITY:<\/b> Asia Pacific University (a division of Ritsumeikan University, also blacklisted) (Private)<br \/>\n<b>LOCATION:<\/b> 1-1 Jumonjibaru, Beppu City, Oita Prefecture, 874-8755<br \/>\n<b>EMPLOYMENT ABUSE:<\/b>  Contract employment with caps.  And they will enforce them in court.  Let&#8217;s quote the university:  <\/p>\n<p><i>&#8220;In relation to the demand for a preliminary injunction in order to preserve the position  outlined in the employment contracts of former <b>full-time Japanese language lecturers<\/b> originally hired in April of 2002 and who had fulfilled their 4 year period of employment, the Oita District Court (presiding judge: KAMINO Taiichi) handed down its verdict on November 30th, unequivocally dismissing the suit launched by the former lecturers.  <\/i><\/p>\n<p>The Court in its ruling confirmed that Ritsumeikan, in its efforts to improve language education at APU, was both reasonable and had cause in <b>abolishing the positions within the lecturer system<\/b> in order to plan for the creation of a new lecturer organization. As to whether the decision to halt the employment of the lecturers was fair and just, the Court ruled that:<\/p>\n<p>   1.<b> There was no truth to the allegation<\/b> that Ritsumeikan, at a Japanese language workshop held in 1999, had indicated <b>that it would endeavor to allow full-time Japanese language lecturers to extend their period of employment should they wish to do so.<\/b><br \/>\n2. That it was possible to infer that expectations for a continuation of employment stemmed from the 1999 Japanese language workshop, yet <b>there was no reason for such expectations.<\/b><br \/>\n3. That the <b>employment contracts in question (for full-time lecturers) outlined an employment period of 4 years<\/b> (the period of guaranteed employment), that <b>the contracts provided a period of employment of 1 year<\/b>, and that although this touched upon Article 14 of the former labor standards law, it was appropriate in this case.<br \/>\n4. That in accordance with the completion of the period of employment, the decision to halt the employment of the former lecturers did not constitute <b>abuse of the right to dismissal.<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Court acknowledged that the response of Ritsumeikan was fair, and thus summarily rejected the former lecturers&#8217; demand.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>========================<br \/>\n<b>SOURCE OF INFORMATION<\/b>: Gloating announcement from the university Vice President on the APU website, dated December 25, 2006, indicating that they had vanquished the &#8220;former full-time&#8221; employees in court.  Merry Christmas to you, too.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apu.ac.jp\/home\/modules\/news\/article.php?storyid=431\">Original link here<\/a>.  In case that disappears, downloadable webarchive here.<br \/>\n<a href=https:\/\/www.debito.org\/APUinjunction010307.webarchive\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/APUinjunction010307.webarchive<\/a><\/p>\n<p>ENDS\n<\/p>\n<p><!--2572fb8d079a3f74d46c7e45dceff153--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Have just updated the Blacklist of Japanese Universities, a website which warns the public about limited employment opportunities in Japanese academia.  New entry is Ritsumeikan&#8217;s flagship Asia Pacific University in Beppu, Oita, Kyushu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,24,19,16,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-149","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-debitoorg-website-updates","category-education","category-labor-issues","category-lawsuits"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=149"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=149"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=149"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=149"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}