{"id":345,"date":"2007-04-20T00:02:54","date_gmt":"2007-04-19T15:02:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=345"},"modified":"2008-04-23T12:16:15","modified_gmt":"2008-04-23T03:16:15","slug":"gyaku-website-accenture-japan-visit-future-immig-surveillance-of-nj","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=345","title":{"rendered":"Gyaku Website: Accenture, JAPAN-VISIT, future Immig surveillance of NJ"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hello Blog.  Got something very interesting to impart.  In a new website entitled <a href=\"http:\/\/gyaku.jp\/en\/\">GYAKU<\/a>, which offers in-depth reportage about lesser-known stories, we have the eye-opening story about the future of electronic surveillance of foreigners entering Japan.  <\/p>\n<p>I have reported in the past about how Japan&#8217;s new Immigration powers will now reinstate fingerprinting for all foreigners who cross Japan&#8217;s borders:<\/p>\n<p><b>Mainichi Daily News, Dec 5, 2004: &#8220;Japan seeks foreigners&#8217; fingerprints, photos, lists to fight terror&#8221;<\/b><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/mainichi120504.html\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/mainichi120504.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>Japan Times May 24, 2005:  &#8220;Here comes the fear: Antiterrorist law creates legal conundrums for foreign residents&#8221;<\/b><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/japantimes052405.html\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/japantimes052405.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>Japan Times November 22, 2005:  &#8220;THE NEW &#8220;I C YOU&#8221; CARDS: LDP proposal to computer chip foreigners has great potential for abuse&#8221;<\/b><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/japantimes112205.html\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/japantimes112205.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Even though Japan&#8217;s NJ residents have fought long and hard (and successfully, until the police took advantage of the fear of terrorism) to end fingerprinting as part of Immigration procedure.<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/fingerprinting.html\">https:\/\/www.debito.org\/fingerprinting.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>So here&#8217;s how it&#8217;s playing out.  According to GYAKU, company without a country (which to some constitutes a security risk in itself) ACCENTURE (which created the digital mug-shot and fingerprint scans seen at US Immigration nowadays) has not only acted as consultant to Japan&#8217;s upcoming version, but also has been awarded the contract to develop Japan&#8217;s system for a song.  This means that Japan becomes the second country to institute one of these systems in the world, in a bid to get a toehold in Asia and profit from the fear of terrorism.  <\/p>\n<p>The issues involved, the political backrooming, and links to all the necessary documents to make the case for concern are available at<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/gyaku.jp\/en\/index.php?cmd=contentview&#038;pid=000188\">http:\/\/gyaku.jp\/en\/index.php?cmd=contentview&#038;pid=000188<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt from the article.  Debito in Sapporo<\/p>\n<p>======================================<br \/>\n<b>Accenture, JAPAN-VISIT, and the mystery of the 100,000 yen bid<br \/>\nTuesday, April 17, 2007<br \/>\nBy gyaku (<a href=\"http:\/\/gyaku.jp\/en\/\">http:\/\/gyaku.jp\/en\/<\/a>)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><i>The story first came to light nearly one year ago, on April 21, 2006, during questioning at the House of Representatives Committee on Judicial Affairs in the Japanese National Diet. Hosaka Nobuto of the Japan Social Democratic Party, a former journalist active in educational issues and one of the leaders in the fight against wiretapping laws in Japan, launched a barrage of questions at government officials over revelations that a contract for a new biometric immigration system had been awarded to Accenture Japan Ltd., a corporation previously hired in the role of &#8220;advisor&#8221; for the same project. For many years a thorn in the side of the ruling party coalition, Hosaka in 2000 was ranked by the Japanese newspaper Asahi shimbun as the most active member of the House of Representatives, with a record 215 questions, a number that rose to over 400 by 2006 [1]. The questions Hosaka put to the government on April 21st were undoubtedly some of the most important of his career, and yet, now nearly a year later, the story that he fought hard to publicize has barely made a ripple in the Japanese media, and remains virtually unknown to the outside world.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The background to the story reads as follows: Accenture Japan Ltd., the Japanese branch of the consulting firm Accenture, active in the Japanese market as far back as 1962 but only incorporated in Japan in 1995, received in May 2004 a contract to draft a report investigating possibilities for reforming the legacy information system currently in use at the Japanese Immigration Bureau. The investigation was requested in the context of government plans, only later made public, to re-implement and modernize a certification system to fingerprint and photograph every foreigner over the age of 18 entering the country, replacing an earlier fingerprinting system abandoned in the year 2000 over privacy concerns after prolonged resistance from immigrant communities.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier the same year, against the backdrop of a post-9\/11 society anxious about the threat of vaguely-defined dark-skinned &#8220;terrorists&#8221;, the U.S. had begun taking fingerprints of foreigners with visas entering the U.S. at international airports and other major ports. A program entitled US-VISIT (Visitor and Immigrant Status Information Technology) was initiated in July of 2003 with the intention to secure nearly 7000 miles of borders along Mexico and Canada, including more than 300 land, air and sea ports [2]. Described as &#8220;the centerpiece of the United States government&#8217;s efforts to transform our nation\u2019s border management and immigration systems&#8221;, planners envisioned &#8220;a continuum of biometrically-enhanced security measures that begins outside U.S. borders and continues through a visitor&#8217;s arrival in and departure from the United States&#8221; [3].<\/p>\n<p>======================<br \/>\nEXCERPT ENDS<\/p>\n<p>Read the rest of the article at:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/gyaku.jp\/en\/index.php?cmd=contentview&#038;pid=000188\">http:\/\/gyaku.jp\/en\/index.php?cmd=contentview&#038;pid=000188<\/a><br \/>\nENDS\n<\/p>\n<p><!--bd7446d38e22877fddecf31eeb1f4c20--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The future of electronic surveillance of NJ first came to light on April 21, 2006, during questioning at the House of Representatives Committee on Judicial Affairs in the Japanese National Diet. Hosaka Nobuto of the Japan Social Democratic Party, a former journalist active in educational issues and one of the leaders in the fight against wiretapping laws in Japan, launched a barrage of questions at government officials over revelations that a contract for a new biometric immigration system had been awarded to Accenture Japan Ltd.  The questions Hosaka put to the government on April 21st were undoubtedly some of the most important of his career, and yet, now nearly a year later, the story that he fought hard to publicize has barely made a ripple in the Japanese media, and remains virtually unknown to the outside world.  GYAKU website aims to remedy that&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33,5,12,26,4,14,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fingerprinting-nj","category-human-rights","category-immigration-assimilation","category-ironies-hypocrisies","category-japanese-government","category-japanese-politics","category-problematic-foreign-treatment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}