{"id":4508,"date":"2009-09-23T02:40:32","date_gmt":"2009-09-22T17:40:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=4508"},"modified":"2009-09-23T17:17:23","modified_gmt":"2009-09-23T08:17:23","slug":"otaru-onsens-case-10th-anniv-3-kokogahen-feb-28-2001-and-their-critique-of-us-plaintiffs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/?p=4508","title":{"rendered":"Otaru Onsens Case 10th Anniv #3: “KokoGaHen” Feb 28 2001 and their critique of us plaintiffs"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Handbook<\/a>\"\\\"<\/a>\"Foreign<\/a>\"\\\"<\/a>\"\u300c\u30b8\u30e3\u30d1\u30cb\u30fc\u30ba\u30fb\u30aa\u30f3\u30ea\u30fc\u3000\u5c0f\u6a3d\u5165\u6d74\u62d2\u5426\u554f\u984c\u3068\u4eba\u7a2e\u5dee\u5225\u300d\uff08\u660e\u77f3\u66f8\u5e97\uff09\"<\/a>\"JAPANESE<\/a>\"sourstrawberriesavatar\"<\/a>
\nUPDATES ON TWITTER: arudoudebito<\/p>\n

OTARU ONSENS TAPE (1999-2003) PART THREE<\/strong><\/p>\n

By Arudou Debito (www.debito.org, debito@debito.org)<\/em><\/p>\n

3) TV ASAHI tabloid show \u201cKOKO GA HEN DA YO NIHONJIN\u201d, on exclusionism in Wakkanai, Monbetsu, and Otaru<\/strong> (Nationally broadcast Feb 28, 2001) (16 minutes).\u00a0 Complete with brickbats for the Plaintiffs for filing suit from the screaming foreign panelists.<\/p>\n

If you would like to download and watch this broadcast in mp4 format on your iPod in one part, click here: https:\/\/www.debito.org\/video\/kokogahen022801.mp4<\/a>. (NB: if you want it to download as a file, not open up in a different browser: right-click for Windows users, or Control + Click for Macs)<\/p>\n

There is also a complete transcript and English translation at https:\/\/www.debito.org\/KokoGaHen1.html<\/a>
\nComment follows video embed (part one):
\n<\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n

COMMENT<\/strong>: I remember clearly three things about that evening:<\/p>\n

1) That ALL the panelists (the half-baked comment from Terii Itoh notwithstanding) on the Japanese side of the fence were very supportive — in fact, they wished us luck and success in the lawsuit.<\/p>\n

2) That ALMOST ALL of the panelists on the NJ side did the same. In fact, it looked in danger of becoming a boring debate because it seemed so cut and dried. It was a tiny minority who stood up to offer brickbats. They were there, at least two of the panelists told me later, because they were chosen precisely because they had strong views antipathetic towards the case. Hence the emphasis, on foreigners who would oppose the lawsuit, as it would make for better television.<\/p>\n

3) That Konishiki, sitting next to me, was goddamn HUGE! His chair, custom-made, needed four people to carry it on stage. We had a few words. Nice guy.<\/p>\n

Quite honestly, I miss the show. Nowhere else offers opinions from NJ, however raw and ill-conceived, in their own words on a regular basis. Arudou Debito in Sapporo<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

OTARU ONSENS TAPE (1999-2003) PART THREE
\n3) TV ASAHI tabloid show \u201cKOKO GA HEN DA YO NIHONJIN\u201d, on exclusionism in Wakkanai, Monbetsu, and Otaru (Nationally broadcast Feb 28, 2001) (16 minutes). Complete with brickbats for the Plaintiffs for filing suit from the screaming foreign panelists.<\/p>\n

If you would like to download and watch this broadcast in mp4 format on your iPod in one part, click here: There is also a complete transcript and English translation here:<\/p>\n

COMMENT: I remember clearly three things about that evening:<\/p>\n

1) That ALL the panelists (the half-baked comment from Terii Itoh notwithstanding) on the Japanese side of the fence were very supportive — in fact, they wished us luck and success in the lawsuit.<\/p>\n

2) That ALMOST ALL of the panelists on the NJ side did the same. In fact, it looked in danger of becoming a boring debate because it seemed so cut and dried. It was a tiny minority who stood up to offer brickbats. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,22,34,20,5,12,26,13,2,6,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bad-social-science","category-cultural-issue","category-exclusionism","category-history","category-human-rights","category-immigration-assimilation","category-ironies-hypocrisies","category-media","category-otaru-onsen-lawsuit","category-speech-materials","category-8"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4508\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.debito.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}