Japan Times JUST BE CAUSE Oct 5 2010: “Census blind to Japan’s true diversity”


Handbook for Newcomers, Migrants, and Immigrants to Japan\Foreign Residents and Naturalized Citizens Association forming NGO\「ジャパニーズ・オンリー 小樽入浴拒否問題と人種差別」(明石書店)JAPANESE ONLY:  The Otaru Hot Springs Case and Racial Discrimination in Japansourstrawberriesavatardebitopodcastthumb
UPDATES ON TWITTER: arudoudebito
DEBITO.ORG PODCASTS on iTunes, subscribe free

Hi Blog. Back from abroad, currently in Tokyo recovering from jetlag, getting ready for my speech at Nihon University this Sunday. Here’s my column from yesterday for commentary.  Enjoy.  Arudou Debito

Census blind to Japan’s true diversity

The Japan Times: Tuesday, Oct. 5, 2010


It’s that time of the decade again. By now, all households in Japan should have received and submitted Japan’s National Census (kokusei chousa), a survey taken every five years expressly to assist in policymaking, drawing up electoral districts and other matters of taxation and representation. This of course includes non-Japanese (NJ) on visas of three months or longer. Get yours?

This time the Japanese government did some nice things for NJ: It offered a multilingual website (Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Portuguese and English) explaining the hows and whys of the census. It also offered the census itself in 27 different languages, along with enhanced privacy protection measures. You can send the form in yourself, for example, so you don’t have some nosy census-taker peering over your shoulder (with the white-hot curiosity some people display over anything an NJ does).

Class act. A golden “Attaboy!” from this columnist.

However, one thing is still unfortunately being overlooked in the census: Japan’s ethnic diversity.

Postwar Japan has officially maintained (justified in part by the feel-good pseudoscience of nihonjinron) that Japan is a monocultural, monoethnic and homogeneous society.

It wasn’t until 1997 that the government officially recognized that any kind of minority even exists in Japan (the Ainu), and it took until 2008 before the Diet passed a resolution recognizing the Ainu as an indigenous people “with a distinct language, religion and culture.”

Nevertheless, this time around Japan’s census does not measure for ethnicity (minzoku). It still measures only for nationality (kokuseki). In other words, on the form you indicate that you are Japanese or that you are miscellaneous (indicate nationality).

So what does that mean for the Ainu? They are Japanese citizens, of course, but their indigenous status remains unaccounted for.

Then how about naturalized citizens? I of course wrote down “Japanese” for my nationality on the census. But I would also have liked to indicate that I am a hyphenated Japanese — a Japanese with American roots, an Amerika-kei Nihonjin.

But it’s not just about me. How about children of international marriages? My kids are just as American as they are Japanese, so why not have it formally acknowledged? It would be in other societies with ethnic diversity. Why can’t we show how genetically diverse Japanese society is, or is becoming?

Because of politics. I believe the government still wants to maintain the image of Japan’s ethnic homogeneity, as it justifies a lot of status-quo policymaking (e.g., a closed-door refugee regime, no official immigration policy, the firm and oft-repeated belief that Japan is not and will never be an “immigration nation”).

After all, Japan’s identity is currently based on the ideals of cultural and even racial purity. Why would one dare to collect official data that would undermine that?

The official reason I keep getting from the Census Bureau is that this is a privacy issue. Asking people for their ethnic backgrounds is apparently too personal.

So you’re saying other questions on the census, such as household income, are not? Our personal information, according to your flash website, is properly protected anyway, right? If privacy is a concern, why does Japan have such an intrusive, even door-to-door, census at all?

Again, the government says it is for the creation of good policy in Japan. Which means, by extension, that matters of diversity and ethnicity are not part of good policymaking?

Sure, it’s nice to believe that by not making an issue of one’s roots, naturalized and multiethnic Japanese are officially treated the same as any other Japanese. But invisibility and accuracy are two different things. If accuracy is what the census is aiming for, it would be better to acknowledge that people of a wide range of ethnicities hold Japanese nationality.

Here a statistic the government already knows: International marriages in Japan have increased from 30,000 to 40,000 couples per year this past decade. Assuming not unreasonably that each couple has two children, mathematically Japan must be home to hundreds of thousands of multiethnic Japanese children. We would know better how many if we only asked.

Moreover, we have more naturalized citizens in Japan than ever before. That matters.

My suggestion: To alleviate privacy concerns, make ethnicity an optional question on the census form. Other questions are optional. Why not this one?

Be accurate. Count us as hyphenated citizens if that’s what we choose. Because like it or not, Japan is becoming multiethnic. Better get some policies ready for it.

Debito Arudou coauthored the “Handbook for Newcomers, Migrants and Immigrants.” Twitter arudoudebito. Just Be Cause appears on the first Community Page of the month. Send comments on this issue to community@japantimes.co.jp
The Japan Times: Tuesday, Oct. 5, 2010


5 comments on “Japan Times JUST BE CAUSE Oct 5 2010: “Census blind to Japan’s true diversity”

  • Tony in Saitama says:

    Filled out the form last night knowing my kids would be misrepresented this way. It stuck in my throat that when I last renewed my Gaijin card I was shown a family tree of all the city residents “connected” to my foreign blood, and asked if my parents or other relatives had come to live with me. I felt as if I was a Burakumin!
    With the census, I was even more shocked to find out they had no interest in how far my kids were from their youchien – they only asked whether location was a separate town or not for shougakou and above. No wonder there is a shortage of youchien/houikuen, and wives can’t get back to work!

  • From what I see, especially among the right-wing side of Japan, is that once you nationalize, you must cut yourself off from your ethnic root and submit yourself completely to Japan, working solely for its national interest. As far as these people are concerned, accepting ethnic diversity will mean that people who have their roots outside Japan may one day betray their country over the country of their ethnic origin. It’s the same logic that put Japanese-Americans over in the US into concentration camps some 60-70 years ago, but the odds that these people will listen to you are probably low…

    — I don’t see the connection between this and an optional question on the Census.

  • Your article was featured in the Have Your Say:


    I think they are doing more damage than good with their comments, but that is my opinion.

    — And that is their opinion. No doubt they’d say I’m the one doing the damage. But they are welcome to obtain their own podium if they can. Writing angry letters to an editor is easy — it’s reactionary, not actionary. Let’s see them (well, one of them, anyway) write their own columns for critique.

  • Latest thing relevant to issue(matters of residency) so I’ll post this article here.

    Thursday, Nov. 25, 2010
    Rare cranes get ‘residency’ cards

    YAMAGUCHI (Kyodo) The municipal government of Suo, Yamaguchi Prefecture, has issued a “special residential registration” card for four hooded cranes that have been wintering in the town since October.

    The Yashiro Basin in Suo is the only location in the Japanese mainland where the birds can be seen. Hooded cranes have been designated by the government as a “special natural monument.”

    City officials said they registered the birds as special residents to promote the town.

    Because of urban expansion and a decrease in farmland, the number of hooded cranes visiting the basin has decreased to around 10 a year.

    Sounds familiar to that Tama-chan thing awhile ago. May or may not be relevant, but I figured it wouldn’t hurt to post.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>