DEBITO.ORG
Arudou Debito/Dave Aldwinckle's Home Page

New ebooks by ARUDOU Debito

  • Book IN APPROPRIATE: A novel of culture, kidnapping, and revenge in modern Japan
  • Amazing new Cabinet survey finds “81% welcome ‘foreigners’ of Japanese descent”. Festival of cognitive dissonance!

    Posted by arudou debito on March 2nd, 2013

    Books etc. by ARUDOU Debito (click on icon):
    Handbook for Newcomers, Migrants, and Immigrants to Japan\" width=「ジャパニーズ・オンリー 小樽入浴拒否問題と人種差別」(明石書店)JAPANESE ONLY:  The Otaru Hot Springs Case and Racial Discrimination in Japansourstrawberriesavatardebitopodcastthumb
    UPDATES ON TWITTER: arudoudebito
    DEBITO.ORG PODCASTS on iTunes, subscribe free
    “LIKE” US on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/debitoorg
    http://www.facebook.com/handbookimmigrants

    Hi Blog.  This has already been discussed better elsewhere, but it would be remiss of Debito.org to not give a bit of space to this amazing Cabinet survey:

    From the Japan Times/Kyodo:

    //////////////////////////////////
    Poll: 81% welcome foreigners of Japanese descent
    KYODO MAR 2, 2013

    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/03/02/national/80-of-japanese-welcome-foreigners-of-japanese-descent/

    More than 80 percent of respondents in a new poll said they are open to foreign nationals of Japanese descent living in the nation, the Cabinet Office reported.

    The office’s first survey of its kind, released Thursday, found 80.9 percent of respondents expressed openness to living alongside those with Japanese ancestry, including Brazilian and Peruvian descendents of Japanese immigrants. Only 12.9 percent opposed the idea.

    Of the 3,000 citizens canvassed in January for the poll, 59.7 percent were also in favor of the central government and municipalities assisting non-Japanese residents to a greater extent, for instance by providing Japanese-language classes for unemployed young people and recruiting interpreters at Hello Work job-placement offices.

    “With more opportunities to interact with foreigners, (Japanese people) are eventually no longer rejecting” the idea of accepting non-Japanese nationals in society, a Cabinet Office official remarked.

    As of the end of 2011, there were fewer than 300,000 foreigners of Japanese descent living in the country, of whom 210,000 were Brazilians and another 50,000 Peruvians, the Cabinet Office said.
    ENDS
    //////////////////////////////////

    Now just sit back in your chair and let that sink in for a moment. We have the highest level of government in Japan conducting a slanted survey (available in Japanese here) asking not about public acceptance of NJ, but rather a breed of NJ, specifically “Nikkei Teijuu Gaikokujin” (non-citizen residents of Japan who are of Japanese lineage). Why would that be the question asked? What policy is retroactively being sought to be justified? And why is this angle newsworthy?

    Apropos of a few answers, here are some comments garnered from Debito.org and elsewhere:

    ==============================
    AS: “Blood = Japanese v.2?”

    JDG: “It’s a brilliantly pointless piece of reporting, for the sake of massaging the egos of the Japanese readers, and assuring them that Japan is a ‘modern’ country… J-public are finally willing to accept foreigners… as long as they are ‘Japanese’ foreigners… I feel like I have gone back in time 5 years. The same politicians are back, the same old economic policies are back, and now Japan wants all those Nikkeijin they paid to go home, to come back too?”

    Puddintain: “Imagine a similar poll in a country mostly populated with folks of white European descent that found that 80% percent of them were willing to live with immigrants of white European descent! Wouldn’t that be something amazing?”
    ==============================

    Robert Moorehead’s JAPANsociology blog offers a more in-depth analysis of the Cabinet survey itself, so I won’t repeat. The most poignant parts of it for me was:

    ==============================
    Moorehead: The survey asked respondents if they knew that there were Nikkei living in Japan, and how they knew this. Nearly 53 percent the respondents either knew that Nikkei were living in Japan, or had heard about it. 46 percent answered that they did not know that this group was living in Japan… [!!!]

    On the one hand, I’m encouraged by the support for Nikkei in Japan. It’s certainly better than if they had said the opposite. But … I’m skeptical. South Americans in Japan, Nikkei and non-Nikkei alike, have told me very clearly that they do not feel included in Japanese society. Instead, borrowing some phrases from Eli Anderson’s The Cosmopolitan Canopy, they’re perpetually ‘on probation.’ In this provisional status, any misstep can be used against you as a sign of the fact that you’ll never fit in…

    Hopefully government officials will use this survey to promote further initiatives to empower the Nikkei (and hopefully other non-Japanese) in Japan. Publicly conducting the survey, posting it on the Cabinet Office website, and releasing it to the press, may indicate that the government is testing public support for such initiatives.

    http://japansociology.com/2013/03/02/80-of-japanese-welcome-foreigners-of-japanese-descent/
    ==============================

    COMMENT: Bingo! As has been noted before on Debito.org, the Cabinet, in its sessions last summer on how to “accept” NJ into Japanese society for future economic vitality, only showed interest in the treatment of Nikkei. Nikkei, you see, are somehow part of “us” (due to Wajin blood conceits), and it looks like Japan’s policymakers are going to give the old failed Nikkei worker importation strategy another try, and cite this “shooting fish in a barrel” survey to support it.

    Anyway, if the Cabinet is so keen on taking surveys, how about its perpetually embarrassing (and, as I’ve reported in the Japan Times, very flawed) Cabinet Survey on Human Rights that it conducts every four years? I just found the 2012 version here, a year late, clearly made public with significantly less fanfare (I searched for it as late as last October).  Perhaps because the results in the past were far more revealing about Japan’s cognitive dissonance regarding human rights (over the past decade or so, only a bit more than half of respondents answered affirmatively to the survey question, “Should foreigners have the same human rights protections as Japanese?”), meaning a large proportion don’t support granting equal human rights to foreign humans!  You see, human rights for NJ, by the very nature of having to ask this kind of question, are optional in Japan.  Less so, it would seem based upon this new Cabinet survey, for the “foreigners” with the right bloodline.  Which is the conceit that this new Cabinet survey is pandering to.

    Ultimately, I believe the GOJ will once again fall into the same old shortsightedness (like so many other societies) of wanting “workers” only to discover later they brought in “people”.  And then, as before, society will seek to denigrate if not get rid of them as soon as they actually have needs (such as health care to provide, children to educate, lifestyles that reflect their backgrounds, retirement pensions to pay, political power to cede) that run counter to the original national plans…  Arudou Debito

    =======================

    PS:  I will talk about the new 2012 Human Rights Survey shortly, after my next Japan Times JBC column comes out next Tuesday JST.  Seems like the surveyers read my 2007 JT column criticizing it, and changed the survey questions regarding NJ discrimination this time.

    9 Responses to “Amazing new Cabinet survey finds “81% welcome ‘foreigners’ of Japanese descent”. Festival of cognitive dissonance!”

    1. Loverilakkuma Says:

      NJ living in Japan as resident aliens or naturalized citizens knows well this is nothing more than official gaze. The state always likes to pull the wool over our eyes by conducting scientifically flawed survey to create this kind of a phony national narrative. For Japan, beauty is in the eyes of deceivers.

    2. Jim di Griz Says:

      Japanese are ready to accept Nikkeijin? Ironically, Nikkeijin are the group least likely to want to come, since they were paid to go home.

    3. dude Says:

      Why don’t we (and by ‘we’ I mean someone other than me) do our own poll, and release the results to media?

      PS: I love it when people say silly things like “it can’t be done”… it can be done, and should be done right. This is a topic that needs to be removed from the GOJ. They don’t deserve to ‘lead’ on this, and so many other topics.

    4. Locohama Says:

      : “Imagine a similar poll in a country mostly populated with folks of white European descent that found that 80% percent of them were willing to live with immigrants of white European descent! Wouldn’t that be something amazing?”

      lol! That about sums it up!

    5. Bob Says:

      I’m encouraged by the 2012 survey you bring up, Debito, in that it shows that most Japanese people recognize that foreigners face discrimination. The top types are “cultural practices that are not accepted,” “refusal of housing” and “negative employment treatment.” The first one I have no idea what they are talking about, but the first step toward solving a problem is recognizing it exists, and it seems that most Japanese people at least recognize the problem.
      In addition, the recognition of the problem seems to have increased from the last survey, based on my reading of the site.

    6. BBBBB Says:

      Second poster hit it on the head. They just paid for them to get back.

      Ironic they claim to accept Japanese “decent” foreigners, when they don’t even do that.

    7. Winning Gold in Dressage Doesn't Count Says:

      I wonder. If there was a poll in Britain on public approval of the UK ancestry visa scheme whether it would cause outrage on human rights blogs.

      http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/visas-immigration/working/uk-ancestry/

    8. Jim Di Griz Says:

      @ Winning Gold….#7

      ‘I wonder. If there was a poll in Britain on public approval of the UK ancestry visa scheme whether it would cause outrage on human rights blogs.’

      Probably not, but since the UK is multi-cultural and has an immigration policy, it has already demonstrated that it is less discriminatory than Japan in this respect.

      Are you making an ‘other counties are discriminatory too’ straw man apologist defense of the Japanese survey? Please clarify your position.

    9. Loverilakkuma Says:

      We just had the tragic news about a Chinese trainee who ended up stabbing his Japanese employer and co-worker to death. This not only shows how ineffective Japan’s die-hard trainee program is but also reinforces media stigma on Chinese migrant workers.

      http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/03/16/national/trainee-admits-double-killing-at-fish-firm-says-colleagues-mistreated-him/

    Leave a Reply