JT: Democratic Party Leader Renho and the “pure blood” mythos (covered in detail in book “Embedded Racism”)

Books, eBooks, and more from Dr. ARUDOU, Debito (click on icon):
Guidebookcover.jpgjapaneseonlyebookcovertextHandbook for Newcomers, Migrants, and Immigrants to Japan「ジャパニーズ・オンリー 小樽入浴拒否問題と人種差別」(明石書店)sourstrawberriesavatardebitopodcastthumbFodorsJapan2014cover
UPDATES ON TWITTER: arudoudebito
DEBITO.ORG PODCASTS on iTunes, subscribe free
“LIKE” US on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/debitoorg
https://www.facebook.com/embeddedrcsmJapan
http://www.facebook.com/handbookimmigrants
https://www.facebook.com/JapaneseOnlyTheBook
https://www.facebook.com/BookInAppropriate
If you like what you read and discuss on Debito.org, please consider helping us stop hackers and defray maintenance costs with a little donation via my webhoster:
Donate towards my web hosting bill!
All donations go towards website costs only. Thanks for your support!

Hi Blog. Phil Brasor at the Japan Times offers us an excellent article on the recent politician Murata Renho flap, as people make an issue of her apparent dual nationality (Japan and Taiwan) and question her loyalties simply because of her apparent “mixed blood” (as if the bloodlines were ever that distinct in the first place in Asia).  No matter.  She still got elected head of the main opposition Democratic Party.  May she put some zing into Japan’s lackluster left-wing.

Some gems from the article that are of note to Debito.org:

//////////////////////////////////////////

“The government itself estimates there are 680,000 Japanese with dual nationality.” […]

“It’s no coincidence that Renho’s detractors are the same people who are against allowing a female emperor. “Pure blood” ideology is at the root of Yawata’s philosophy — the “scoop” about Renho’s dual nationality was merely a delivery device. The law means nothing to them because their faith is invested in an occult mythos about the unbroken Imperial line. [Journalist] Kosugi Misuzu insists these beliefs amount to “racism,” since they limit the rights of some people born and raised in Japan due to genetics. Asahi reported on July 6, 2014 — well before the Renho controversy — that the pure blood faction wants to kick out permanent Korean residents as well as anyone with dual citizenship by making all Japanese sign a loyalty oath. They are not just rightists, said the paper, they are “anachronisms.”

“[Former bureaucrat] Yawata Kazuro says Renho can’t be trusted because she doesn’t use her Japanese married name and gave her children names that “sound Chinese.” These value judgments should mean nothing in a democracy. Zakzak, another Sankei organ, adds to the din by saying that Japanese people do not like the idea of someone with dual citizenship “rising to the top.” What about best-selling Japanese-American singer Hikaru Utada and all those bicultural athletes at the Rio Olympics? For that matter, what about former Peruvian president Alberto Fujimori, who was allowed to settle here and escape prosecution in his native country by asserting his Japanese nationality?”

////////////////////////////////////////

All of these issues, particularly the “pure blood” conceit, have been brought up passim in book “Embedded Racism:  Visible Minorities and Racial Discrimination in Japan“.  Renho herself features prominently in the book (Chapter Seven), given that Japan’s racist politicians have questioned her loyalty many times before — for example when she was a Cabinet member in the previous DPJ government — simply because she’s to them a mudblood.  And they can get away with it because the “pure blood” narrative is so strong.

Please read the full article at http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/09/17/national/media-national/renho-pure-blood-mythos/. Courtesy of JDG. Dr. ARUDOU, Debito

================================

Do you like what you read on Debito.org?  Want to help keep the archive active and support Debito.org’s activities?  We are celebrating Debito.org’s 20th Anniversary in 2016, so please consider donating a little something.  More details here.

20 comments on “JT: Democratic Party Leader Renho and the “pure blood” mythos (covered in detail in book “Embedded Racism”)

  • And its so Ironic because they always want to talk about the racism in america and other countries but when ever you bring up these racist facts about japan they become silent and dont want to discuss it, so thats part of the problem here.

  • Andrew in Saitama says:

    I’m curious as to what a lot of commentators on social media mean when they accuse Renho of being “Pro-Chinese”. They never come up with any concrete examples, so I assume it it either her heritage, a softer stance on China, or a mixture of both. Neither of which add up to being “anti-Japanese”.

    We need a few more Nobel Prize winners who gave up Japanese nationality to get some balance back into the debate.

  • Loverilakkuma says:

    Jeff Kingston had his say in recent interview with ABC News(Australia) Japan in Focus.

    http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/newsradio/audio/japaninfocus/201609/r1615721_24607255.mp3

    It’s kind of dirty job for right-wing media to inflame a “minor legal” issue (even their news writers don’t even bother cover because it’s of their concern) to national scandal. These third-rate Japanese language media never fail to find their scapegoat to perpetuate an outdated nativism.

  • Does she have two passports? I assume she just has the Japanese one.
    Thing is, her election was played up on Taiwanese TV in a positive light and I guess it rubs the right-wing the wrong way.
    Koike seems popular and if Renho can make the DPJ more popular, it doesn’t look good for the LDP.
    Odd thing is that I have read that Inada may be the one Abe wants to succeed him – a woman but a pure Yamato Japanese.

  • As Renho is of Taiwanese origin, surely she would be anti CCP and mainland China, if anything. So Yawata is talking out of his a……

    Just racism, pure and simple. And this co,pletely destroys the Jimperialist myth of the “Co Prosperity Sphere” being benign; Taiwan is oft held as an example of a “nice” Japanese colony, but here they are still seen as Chinese gaijin.

  • Thanks for posting this Dr.!

    @ Jim #2,
    I agree with you 100%, but I honestly believe that most Japanese can’t see the hypocrisy of ridiculing racism in the US whilst denying the existence of racism in Japan since Japanese education teaches from Junior High School about Martin Luther King and presents racism as something white people do to non-whites: ergo, ‘There is no racism in Japan’ myth.

    Add to this the overwhelming cultural narrative that defines the Japanese as ‘unique’ that serves to rationalize Japanese racism as the natural world order (after all, this is a remnant of Japanese Inperial era ideology), and therefore Japanese racism isn’t seen as ‘racism’, but their natural entitlement.

    @ Andrew in Saitama #3,

    She is pushing the all the buttons of the right wingers;
    She’s a woman who wants to be their leader! Whatever next? A female Emperor?
    She’s not even 100% Japanese! She’s half gaijin on her fathers side! Therefore her blood, brain, behavior and sense of being Japanese are questionable.

    I’m guessing that’s what they are thinking. Most of it is projection; they believe in racist blood-purity definitions of identity, and therefore are incapable of believing that she has Japans best interest at heart.

    The thing is, Japanese culture and society tacitly endorses this position so strongly, that if she tried to call the right wingers out on their idiocy, she would end up being worse off as she would be slayed for daring to criticize an aspect of Japan. It’s a clever trap;

    A: “You’re not Japanese.”
    B: “Yes I am!”
    A: “Look everyone! There’s the proof! A real Japanese would just silently endure.”

    I think Dr. Debito did a JBC once on ‘gaman’ as a tool of bullying, I don’t remember.

    — I think you’re thinking of this article.

  • I’ve always been curious about what people mean when they say “occult mythos about the unbroken Imperial line”.
    Is the idea that Japanese imperial line is unbroken going back to at least the seventh century a lie?

    What does “unbroken” even mean? I know that Tanizaki’s translation of “Genji” was censored in the pre-war years
    because the work portrays an “irregularity” of sorts in imperial succession,
    but even in fictional works like “Genji” and “Ise” these irregularities consist of an imperial prince
    (a first- or second-generation descendant of a previous emperor) fathering an illegitimate child with the empress,
    and his son going on to become emperor because all the world assumes the child to be the son of the emperor.

    Anyway, the word “mythos” here is unusual, but I’d guess the author took it to mean the same thing as “myth”
    and took “myth” in the somewhat slang-y sense of “a widely held but false belief or idea”
    (even though I’ve never actually seen the word “mythos” used in this sense before).
    I have definitely seen people claim in online forums that there is a Japanese “myth” about an unbroken imperial line,
    but when I asked them I was not able to get a straight answer.

    I would be interested to hear what Debito has to say on the matter.

    — I don’t know enough to comment on the matter.

  • @ Owen Hughes #9

    I took it to mean belief in a world order where the Emperor reigns by the ‘mandate of heaven’ (in the post Meiji restoration era Neo-Confucian sense) based on the idea that his ‘earliest ancestor’ literally descended from heaven.

    Don’t you think so? This is the basis of imperial era ideology, and therefore of the right wingers.

    Of course, we know this to be literally untrue, and a modern fabrication, whereas the right wingers believe it to be literal truth.

    Hence, it’s an ‘occult mythos’ with the emphasis on ‘cult’.

  • Mythos is a synonym for myth or mythology.

    The Emperors of Japan are considered to be direct descendants of Amaterasu, the immortal sun godess.

  • This myth about unbroken imperial line and Yamato is mind boogling to me when it has already been a scientific proven fact that all Japanese, I repeat that all Japanese DNA is mixed with Chinese, Korean & mongols. So I like to always enlighten my incoming freshman every year who are always a gasp with this fact when we discuss it. But of course the inconvenient truth would never ever be in any Japanese school textbook.

  • @ Jim #12

    I saw a great documentary made in the UK about 15 years ago, that showed that people of different ethnicities shared the same Mitrochondrial DNA, and therefore shared a common female ancestor, despite one of them being black, one caucasion, and so on.

    One of the subjects was a Japanese guy, and this information BLEW HIS MIND!

    I wish I could remember the name of the documentary, the TV station, or the guys who did the research.

  • @ Jim #12,

    It’s mind boggling to me too, but there are people who believe in all sorts of gods and things.

  • “Kosugi Misuzu insists these beliefs amount to “racism,” since they limit the rights of some people born and raised in Japan due to genetics.”

    I applaud this person for realizing a problem exists. However, something about this comment struck me the first time I read it and I couldn’t let it be. It kept coming back up in my mind and I kept gnawing at it.

    The problem of this right wing nihonjinron racial purity isn’t that it is “limiting the rights of some people”. People’s human rights are (or should be) protected by the law (now that is another can of worms in whether or not every resident of Japan has the same human rights under Japanese law, but for the sake of the point I want to make let us assume that UN treaty obligations mean that we all have the same human rights.) And of course, non-Japanese residents don’t have some rights such as the right to vote. That is entirely a legal and practical issue.

    The real problem of this right wing nihonjinron racial purity idea is that people of a different ethnic “look” (lets face it, it’s largely about looks) don’t get the same opportunities as everyone else and get worse treatment in general. Opportunities – I’m talking about smart kids born in Japan but who look like a different ethnicity won’t get offered the goods jobs. Worse treatment – I’m talking about society in general assuming they “lack” some ability in language or in their ability to negotiate relationships in Japanese society or being singled out by police. Or just plain old ‘your blood is tainted’ racism. They’re the core problem the different ethnicities face in Japan.

    Peace out.

    Oh, and did anyone else think that this year’s miss Japan winner looks 100% Japanese anyway? So what’s the big hoohaa? And isn’t it no surprise she herself said she didn’t feel racially discriminated against?

  • KengaiIkken-san says:

    Q. What’s changed in honne Japanese thinking since 大和民族を中核とする世界政策の検討?
    A. Nothing much.

  • TJJ,
    true. I know of a young man who can’t even get a job at McDonalds. He is half-black, half-Japanese, and trilingual (knows Chinese too)
    All he wants is a part-time job while he goes to a vocational school in Tokyo.

  • Just to add a bit more to my earlier (#15) comment regarding:

    “Kosugi Misuzu insists these beliefs amount to “racism,” since they limit the rights of some people born and raised in Japan due to genetics.”

    1. Well, Japanese law itself, not just the Japanese racial narrative, “limit(s) the rights of some people born and raised in Japan”. The Japanese law itself does that. Simply being “born and raised” in Japan does not qualify you for equal rights and privileges, in the same way that being born into a Japanese family does.

    2. “due to genetics”. Well, I think the issue of genetics is more than an arms length away from the real problem. We, as humans, are not now nor ever have we been in a position to casually judge a person we meet based on their genes. Because unless we test them we don’t know anything about their genes. Am I being pedantic? A little, but my point is that racism in Japan is conducted on a few fronts. None of them are based on genetics, in actual fact. One of them is based on perceived ethnicity though, and that was my point.

    I hope my comments are not perceived as nitpicking. But the devil is in the details after all and obscuring details is what helps keep people ignorant about these issues. So I think it is vital that terms be properly used and we try to refrain from simply using jingoistic phrases in cases where they do not necessarily fit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>